By
Felizar Mortillero
I'm one
of the legion of believers that Gat Andres de Castro Bonifacio was the first
President of the Philippines. After he became Supreme Leader of the Katipunan,
he established a government called "Republika ng Katagalugan", this
does not mean that he was regionalistic. He simply wanted all of the Filipinos
regardless of tribal lineage or ethnicity be called as Tagalogs, because for
him "Filipinos" were Spaniards born in the Philippines.
His
government had a President, with him as one, had a cabinet, had a constitution,
had an official seal, but these proofs and evidences as can be seen from
official records of such government and the Katipunan were downplayed and was
not given credence by the historians related to the so-called "First
President" of the Philippines, Emilio Famy Aguinaldo.
Is it
not that Andres Bonifacio was elected Supreme Leader of the Katipunan the way
Emilio Aguinaldo was elected? Why is it that Aguinaldo is being considered a
Philippine President when he was not elected at large by the people of the
Philippines? If Aguinaldo is being considered as President of the Revolutionary
Philippine Government, then there is no reason for the historians to consider
Andres Bonifacio as President and the first as such in the annals of history of
the Philippines.
Declaring
Andres Bonifacio as the first President of the Philippines would mean
correction of Philippine History and would further mean a service of justice to
him who fought for the independence of the Philippines and died under his
former allies turned political rivals who were only after their political
futures nothing more, nothing less.
No comments:
Post a Comment